Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.960/2022

Case between Glady et al vs Asha et al regarding dismissal for default

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri.Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-06-13
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Glady and Viji, were involved in a suit against defendants Asha, Hema, and Suresh. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiffs were absent and unrepresented.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiffs and no representation being made on their behalf.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiffs and no representation being made on their behalf.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs did not appear or have representation in court.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiffs did not appear or have representation in court.
Supporting Evidence
Since, the plaintiff is neither present nor represented, the suit is dismissed for default.

Judgment Evidence:

The suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Glady
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Viji
Party Age
49
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Asha
Party Age
69
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Hema
Party Age
30
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Suresh
Party Age
33
Relation
H/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. L.D. Lijo Roy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Alen N Albin
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.K.S. Gopinathan Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Biju.P.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Since, the plaintiff is neither present nor represented, the suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Glady et al vs Asha et al regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Glady et al vs Asha et al regarding dismissal for default

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won