Case Summary
Geetha.L filed a suit against Akil Alias Shanu and Jayakumar Alias Unni. The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was neither present nor represented.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed as the plaintiff was absent and did not have any representation in court.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
The suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Geetha.L
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Akil Alias Shanu
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jayakumar Alias Unni
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Arshambika.M
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P.M. Idikula Matai
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Kovalam B Ajith Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Since, the plaintiff is neither present nor represented, the suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Geetha.L vs Akil Alias Shanu et al regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Geetha.L vs Akil Alias Shanu et al regarding dismissal for default