Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.765/2020

Case between Geetha Divakaran et al vs Rajmohanan Nair et al regarding mediation settlement

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-01-23
Duration
approximately-4 years 6 months
Case Code No.
765
Case Closed
Thu, 01/23/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Geetha Divakaran, Deepak Divakaran, and Deepa. G, were involved in a suit against defendants Rajmohanan Nair and R.Arjun. The matter was settled through mediation.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found that the matter was settled in mediation and deemed the mediation agreement lawful. The suit was decreed in line with that agreement.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the matter was settled in mediation and deemed the mediation agreement lawful. The suit was decreed in line with that agreement.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The matter was lawfully settled in mediation.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The matter was lawfully settled in mediation.
Supporting Evidence
Mediation agreement found to be lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the suit is decreed in terms of the mediation agreement.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Geetha Divakaran
Party Age
63
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Deepak Divakaran
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Deepa. G
Party Age
39
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajmohanan Nair
Party Age
62
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
R.Arjun
Party Age
32
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Mediation agreement
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri S.Sreebhadran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.S Mahadevan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Geetha Nair. S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Rajeswari.V
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2020

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Wed, 07/01/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 01/23/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won