Case Summary
The case involves G. Mohanachandran as the plaintiff and multiple defendants including Satheesh Kumar @ A. Sasidharan. The case was resolved through a lawful compromise agreement.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found the compromise petition to be lawful and decreed the suit in terms of that compromise, making it part of the decree.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The compromise petition was found to be lawful.
The compromise petition was found to be lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The compromise petition was found to be lawful.
The compromise petition was found to be lawful.
Supporting Evidence
The compromise petition found to be lawful.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, the suit is decreed in terms of the compromise. The compromise shall form part of the decree.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- G. Mohanachandran
- Party Age
- 66
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Satheesh Kumar @ A. Sasidharan
- Party Age
- 51
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vijayan @ Samuel
- Party Age
- 50
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Thankarajan
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. G.S. Sanal Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. V.G. Harikumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The suit is decreed in terms of the compromise.
Evidence:
the suit is decreed in terms of the compromise.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2021
Case Flags
Out-of-Court Settlement