Case Summary
Fathima Rehman is the plaintiff in this case, while R.R. Rarith and P.V. Rajeswary are the defendants. The case involves a compromise petition that has been filed and allowed by the court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court has allowed the compromise petition and decreed the suit in terms of the compromise. The agreement will form part of the decree.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the agreement were found to be lawful.
The terms of the agreement were found to be lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The terms of the agreement were found to be lawful.
The terms of the agreement were found to be lawful.
Supporting Evidence
The court expressed satisfaction with the lawfulness of the terms of the agreement.
Judgment Evidence:
I am satisfied that terms of agreement is lawful. IA 4/25 is allowed. Suit is decreed in terms of compromise petition.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Fathima Rehman
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- R.R. Rarith
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- P.V. Rajeswary
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- Widow of
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. S. Balachandran Kulasekharam
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.M.R. Anandakuttan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed in terms of compromise petition.
Evidence:
IA 4/25 is allowed. Suit is decreed in terms of compromise petition.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2022
Case Flags
Out-of-Court Settlement