Case Summary
Ershad, the plaintiff, was absent during the proceedings and is reported to be no more since November 14, 2024. The court found that no steps were taken to implead the legal heirs of the deceased plaintiff, leading to the abatement of the suit.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court declared the suit abated due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation, along with the plaintiff's reported death and failure to implead legal heirs.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence Suit stands Abated.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ershad
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Saifudeen
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Kulathoor Rahul. L.R
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Vellaada Rethin. R
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. S. Asharaf
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt. A. Sireesha
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ershad vs Saifudeen regarding suit abatement
Case Code Year
Case between Ershad vs Saifudeen regarding suit abatement