Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RENT CONTROL PETITION No. 129/2022

Case between Edavatheri Puthalath Abdulla vs Biyyathu et al regarding Rent Control Petition

Court
RENT CONTROL COURT/ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF - I
Judge
Smt. Shabeena M.
Order Date
2025-01-09
Duration
approximately-2 years 24 days
Case Closed
Thu, 01/09/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner is Edavatheri Puthalath Abdulla, the landlord, seeking to evict the respondents, who are the legal heirs of the deceased tenant Hassainar Haji, from the petition schedule shop room. The petitioner requires the room for his son's business.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition was allowed, directing the respondents to surrender vacant possession of the shop room within one month. If they fail to do so, the petitioner can execute the order through the process of law.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Respondents are directed to surrender vacant possession of the petition schedule room.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was allowed, directing the respondents to surrender vacant possession of the shop room within one month. If they fail to do so, the petitioner can execute the order through the process of law.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the petitioner established his case and requires the room for business purposes.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The evidence of PW1 and PW2 and the documents relied upon them were remained unchallenged. As such, I find that the petitioner has established his case and therefore he is entitled to an order as prayed for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, this petition is allowed under Section 11(3) of KBLR Act are follows: 1) The respondents are hereby directed to surrender vacant possession of the petition schedule room within one month from today, failing which the petitioner can get the order executed through the process of law.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Edavatheri Puthalath Abdulla
Party Age
66
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Biyyathu
Party Age
42
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kunhammad
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Suhara
Party Age
38
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ramla
Party Age
36
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ibrayi
Party Age
34
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Coolikaichitt (Original) entered into between Edavatheri Puthalath Abdulla and Koolikandiyil Hassainar Haji, Copy of Lawyer notice sent by Adv. P.A. Jaleel to Hassainar Haji, Postal receipt, Returned Postal cover
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P.A. Jaleel
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Direction to the respondents to surrender vacant possession of the petition schedule room.
Evidence:
The respondents are hereby directed to surrender vacant possession of the petition schedule room within one month from today.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioner can realize the costs from the respondents.
Evidence:
The petitioner can realize the costs from the respondents.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lease Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the original lease agreement entered into between the petitioner and the original tenant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is a notice sent by the petitioner's advocate to the original tenant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as proof of mailing the lawyer's notice.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Returned Postal cover
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document indicates the returned postal communication link to the notice.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Bonafide requirement of landlord
Case Code
Case between Edavatheri Puthalath Abdulla vs Biyyathu et al regarding Rent Control Petition
Case Code Year
Case between Edavatheri Puthalath Abdulla vs Biyyathu et al regarding Rent Control Petition

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Sun, 01/09/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 01/09/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Mr.Ferose VP vs Mr.Waseem Thondikodan regarding eviction
RENT CONTROL COURT/PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Suresh Kumar et al vs K.T. Sasidharan regarding rent control eviction
Rent Control Court/Additional Munsiff - I
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between K. Jubairiya et al vs Valiyaveetu Parambil Hamsakoya regarding eviction from leased shop room
RENT CONTROL COURT/ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF - I
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Shoukkathali et al vs Smt.Sumathi regarding eviction under Rent Control Act
RENT CONTROL COURT/PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between O.K.Lasitha vs Janakiyamma.P.P regarding eviction under KBLR Act
RENT CONTROL COURT/PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won