Case Summary
Dilip Desmond filed a suit against Abhilash Nair. The plaintiff was absent and did not represent himself in court, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Unknown
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, the suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Dilip Desmond
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Abhilash Nair
- Party Age
- 40
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Hari S Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Subha.S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Evidence:
Hence, the suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Unknown
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Dilip Desmond vs Abhilash Nair regarding suit dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Dilip Desmond vs Abhilash Nair regarding suit dismissal for default