Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.619/2015

Case between Devaki et al vs Babukuttan et al regarding dismissal of suit

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Judge
Smt. Salini.B.
Order Date
2025-01-22
Duration
Case Code No.
619
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves plaintiffs Devaki and Lali against defendants Babukuttan and Sasikala. The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiffs and lack of representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs and lack of a sufficient reason for adjourning the evidence.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs and lack of a sufficient reason for adjourning the evidence.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs did not appear in court, and no sufficient reason was provided to adjourn the evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiffs did not appear in court, and no sufficient reason was provided to adjourn the evidence.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiffs were absent and did not file any chief affidavit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Devaki
Party Age
78
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Lali
Party Age
35
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Babukuttan
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sasikala
Party Age
40
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Vakkom Lali Sunil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.J.K.Ajith Prasad
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The suit is dismissed due to the plaintiffs' absence and lack of representation.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent. No representation. Defendants represented. IA 2548/25 is dismissed. No chief affidavit seen filed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2015

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won