Case Summary
C.P. Sasidharan filed a rent control petition against Abdul Majeed E. The petition was dismissed as not pressed after being heard by the court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition as not pressed.
Key Reasoning:
The petition was not pursued by the petitioner.
The petition was not pursued by the petitioner.
Why Defendant Won:
The petition was not pursued by the petitioner.
The petition was not pursued by the petitioner.
Supporting Evidence
The petition was not pursued by the petitioner.
Judgment Evidence:
Petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- C.P. Sasidharan
- Party Age
- 74
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Abdul Majeed E
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Vakalath fee - 6.00, Document Fee - 4.00, Process fee - Nil, Petition fee - 60.00, Commission Batta - 5000.00
Defendants Documents
Nil
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Bhahuleyan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. M. Sajith
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The petition was dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
R.C.P.NO.
Case Code Year
2025