Case Summary
Canara Bank filed a suit against Syama.S.N regarding a court fee issue. The court found that no balance court fee was remitted and rejected the plaint.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint due to the absence of balance court fee remittance by the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
The plaint was rejected based on the failure to remit balance court fees as required by the Code of Civil Procedure.
The plaint was rejected based on the failure to remit balance court fees as required by the Code of Civil Procedure.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
No Balance Court Fee seen remitted. No application seen filed.
Judgment Evidence:
the plaint is rejected under order VII Rule 11(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Canara Bank
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Syama.S.N
Plaintiffs Documents
Not applicable
Defendants Documents
Not applicable
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P. Rajendran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Pradeep Lal.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The plaint is rejected under order VII Rule 11(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Evidence:
No Balance Court Fee seen remitted. No application seen filed. Hence, the plaint is rejected under order VII Rule 11(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs Syama.S.N regarding Court Fee Remittance
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs Syama.S.N regarding Court Fee Remittance