Case Summary
Canara Bank filed a suit against Sunilkumar. M for a legal remedy. The court has rejected the plaint due to non-payment of court fees by the plaintiff.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint filed by Canara Bank due to non-payment of court fees.
Key Reasoning:
Plaint was rejected due to lack of payment of the court fees.
Plaint was rejected due to lack of payment of the court fees.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaint was rejected due to lack of payment of the court fees.
Plaint was rejected due to lack of payment of the court fees.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff has not paid BCF so far.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence plaint is rejected under Order 7 Rule 11(1) of CPC.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Canara Bank
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sunilkumar. M
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Abdul Jaleel Onath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Kishore Bhaktha
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Plaint rejected due to non-payment
Evidence:
Plaintiff has not paid. BCF so far. Hence plaint is rejected under Order 7 Rule 11(1) of CPC.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs Sunilkumar. M regarding rejection of plaint
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs Sunilkumar. M regarding rejection of plaint