Case Summary
The case involves Canara Bank as the plaintiff and Soniya Babu and Babu as defendants. The plaintiff was absent, and the case was dismissed for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff not present.
Plaintiff not present.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff not present.
Plaintiff not present.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff not present.
Judgment Evidence:
Since the plaintiff is absent, the suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Canara Bank
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Soniya Babu
- Party Age
- 28
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Babu
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Adv. T. S. Zhakaria
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Adv. Roshan Zakharia
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Since the plaintiff is absent, the suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs Soniya Babu et al regarding dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs Soniya Babu et al regarding dismissal for default.