Case Summary
Canara Bank filed a suit against Shilpa S. Kumar and Sindhu Sasikumar. The suit was not pressed and was dismissed by the court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The suit filed by Canara Bank was found to be not pressed and was therefore dismissed by the court.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, the suit is dismissed as not pressed. No costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Canara Bank
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shilpa S. Kumar
- Party Age
- 28
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sindhu Sasikumar
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Sreena L.K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Sana J.O
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Sreeja Sasidharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Haripriya. J
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Endorsed that the suit is not pressed. Hence, the suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2023