Case Summary
The plaintiff Canara Bank was represented in court. The defendants were two individuals, Rinsa.N and Mohammed Siras. The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit filed by Canara Bank was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and no further steps taken despite various opportunities being given.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Canara Bank
- Party Age
- 35
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rinsa.N
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mohammed Siras
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Muttathara.A.Viswambharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Bibina Salu.R.B
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to plaintiff's absence and lack of further steps.
Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2022