Case Summary
The case involves Canara Bank, represented by its manager, against Radhamani. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The suit has been dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff and no representation.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the suit.
Plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the suit.
Plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the suit.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent, no representation.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit stands dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Canara Bank
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Radhamani
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Prasanth.K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P. Santhosh Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt.D.Supriya
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Atheeth Akash.S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent, no representation. Defendant represented. Hence I find no reason to proceed with suit. Suit stands dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs Radhamani regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs Radhamani regarding dismissal of suit