Case Summary
Canara Bank represented by its Branch Manager filed a suit against multiple defendants including Parvathy.A.S, Sindhu.P, and Nazar. The suit was dismissed for default after the plaintiff's counsel requested exparte evidence and noted that no steps were taken by the defendants.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff's counsel failed to take necessary steps despite repeated opportunities.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Canara Bank
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Parvathy.A.S
- Party Age
- 25
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sindhu.P
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nazar
- Party Age
- 66
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Niyas A. Salam
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Hence the suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs Parvathy.A.S et al regarding dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs Parvathy.A.S et al regarding dismissal for default.