Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 300/2024

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s.Snap Shot et al regarding settlement of suit.

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt.ANJALI. P
Order Date
2025-08-02
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Canara Bank filed a suit against M/s.Snap Shot and Ramesh Panicker. The suit is about a claim settled between the parties.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit has been dismissed as settled between the parties. The plaintiff is entitled to a refund of court fees as per the rules.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of court fee as per rules
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit has been dismissed as settled between the parties. The plaintiff is entitled to a refund of court fees as per the rules.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The suit was settled between the parties through a joint statement.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The suit was settled between the parties through a joint statement.
Supporting Evidence
The suit was settled between the parties through a joint statement.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is dismissed as settled. Plaintiff shall be entitled to refund of court fee as per rules.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vishnu.M
Party Age
33
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s.Snap Shot
Party Age
53
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ramesh Panicker
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Baija. P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Joshila.K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff shall be entitled to refund of court fee as per rules.
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed as settled. Plaintiff shall be entitled to refund of court fee as per rules.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs M/s.Snap Shot et al regarding settlement of suit.
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs M/s.Snap Shot et al regarding settlement of suit.

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between South Malabar Gramin Bank et al vs Leela.C.K regarding petition for decree transmission.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs BABEESH.K et al regarding realisation of amount.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank et al vs Sunena.C et al regarding plaint rejection
THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/S UCO Bank vs Mr. Akhil raj.O et al regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s. UCO Bank vs Abhinav.K.P et al regarding dismissal of suit.
MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won