Case Summary
Canara Bank filed a suit against M/s.Jeni Enterprises and Jenisha.T.T. Both parties had no representation during the hearing, and the plaint was subsequently rejected.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint due to the absence of both parties' representations.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, plaint is rejected.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Canara Bank
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/s.Jeni Enterprises
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jenisha.T.T
- Party Age
- 41
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Adv. Sri.K.Satheesh Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Adv.Sreedharan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs M/s.Jeni Enterprises et al regarding plaint rejection
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs M/s.Jeni Enterprises et al regarding plaint rejection