Case Summary
Canara Bank, represented by Sujith S., filed a suit against Mr. Bejin. S. and M/s. Makshathra Fresh juice and Dry Fruits shop. The suit was ultimately rejected due to the defendants' lack of appearance and failure to take steps.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was rejected due to the plaintiff's counsel noting repeated opportunities were granted but no steps were taken by the defendants.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the suit is rejected.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Canara Bank (erstwhile Sydicate Bank)
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mr. Bejin. S.
- Party Age
- 33
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/s. Makshathra Fresh juice and Dry Fruits shop
- Relation
- Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Nizar. A.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
the suit is rejected
Evidence:
even then no steps taken. Hence the suit is rejected.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs M/s. Makshathra Fresh juice and Dry Fruits shop regarding rejection of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs M/s. Makshathra Fresh juice and Dry Fruits shop regarding rejection of suit