Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.325 /2022

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s Arabeiq Restaurant et al regarding dismissal of suit.

Court
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-03-28
Duration
Case Code No.
325
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Canara Bank, represented by Nidhin.M, filed a suit against M/s Arabeiq Restaurant and others. The suit was dismissed as not pressed due to the absence of the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the case as the plaintiff was absent and had filed a not press memo.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the case as the plaintiff was absent and had filed a not press memo.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not attend court and requested to withdraw the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not attend court and requested to withdraw the suit.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent, no representation. Defendants represented. Plaintiff filed not press memo on 01.02.2025.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s Arabeiq Restaurant
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sharan R.S
Party Age
28
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Usman
Party Age
28
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Pradeep P.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Renu.G
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Rajeena. R. Maxipaul
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Syamkrishnan M.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Nandu Prakash J.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Hence, the suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Aradhi Restaurant regarding rejection of plaint
Court of Principal Munsiff
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Santhosh Kumar regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayan. E et al regarding realisation of money
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Smt. Sheeja. N regarding plaint rejection
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won