Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • About us
  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • Contact Us
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 145 OF 2017

Case between Canara Bank vs Moideenkutty regarding loan recovery

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy.T.V.
Order Date
2017-12-15
Duration
1 day

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Canara Bank filed a suit against Moideenkutty seeking recovery of a loan amount due for starting a barber shop.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff bank an amount of Rs. 2,44,349 with future interest at 9% per annum.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Recovery of loan amount with interest
Case Type
Civil Suit - Money Recovery
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff bank provided cogent and reliable evidence, and the defendant did not contest the claims.

Judgment Evidence:

The suit is decreed as follows: I. The defendant is hereby directed to pay the plaintiff bank an amount of Rs. 2,44,349 /- (Rupees two lakh forty four thousand three hundred and forty-nine only) with future interest at 9% per annum on Rs.2,37,108/- from the date of suit till the date of realization.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Canara Bank (Age not specified years) Kuttippuram Branch

Defendants

Moideenkutty (63 years) Thattottil House, Kadakkassery, Ayankalam, Tavanur amsom, Ponnani Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Money Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Recovery of loan amount with interest
Evidence:
The defendant is directed to pay the plaintiff bank an amount of Rs. 2,44,349 /- with future interest at 9% per annum.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Application for Loans to Micro and Small Enterprises
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Financial assistance application for the loan for starting a barber shop.
Reference:
A1
Document Type: Sanction Memorandum
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document showing sanction of the loan facility.
Reference:
A2
Document Type: Agreement cum deed of Hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement for hypothecation of furniture and accessories purchased for the barber shop.
Reference:
A3
Document Type: Letter of Undertaking Loan/Advance
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Letter of undertaking by the defendant.
Reference:
A4
Document Type: Certified copy of Ledger Extract
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of computerized ledger accounts showing the due amount.
Reference:
A7

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Thu, 12/14/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases