Case Summary
The case involves Canara Bank as the plaintiff and Beena Antony along with Alan Antony as the defendants. The suit was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiff.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit filed by Canara Bank has been dismissed because the plaintiff's counsel indicated it was not pressed. The court pronounced this judgment in open court.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Canara Bank
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Beena Antony
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Alan Antony
- Party Age
- 27
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.S.Ranjith Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Arul.K.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Suit dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2023