Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.645/2024

Case between Canara Bank vs Akamsha.S et al regarding plaint rejection

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-07-04
Duration
Case Closed
Fri, 07/04/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves Canara Bank as the plaintiff and Akamsha.S and others as defendants regarding the rejection of a plaint. The suit was finally heard and a judgment was delivered on the same day.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaint submitted by the plaintiff has been rejected by the court due to non-remittance of the balance court fee and lack of a filed application.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaint submitted by the plaintiff has been rejected by the court due to non-remittance of the balance court fee and lack of a filed application.
Key Reasoning:
The plaint was rejected under Order VII Rule 11 (c) of the Code of Civil Procedure due to procedural deficiencies.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaint was rejected under Order VII Rule 11 (c) of the Code of Civil Procedure due to procedural deficiencies.
Supporting Evidence
The rejection was based on the plaintiff's failure to remit the balance court fee and not filing the required application.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the plaint is rejected under Order VII Rule 11 (c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Akamsha.S
Party Age
27
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sheela.S
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sunil Kumar
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
None mentioned
Defendants Documents
None mentioned

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. K. Prasanth
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Ajesh.B
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The plaint was rejected due to non-remittance of balance court fee.
Evidence:
the plaint is rejected under Order VII Rule 11 (c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs Akamsha.S et al regarding plaint rejection
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs Akamsha.S et al regarding plaint rejection

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
Fri, 07/04/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Aradhi Restaurant regarding rejection of plaint
Court of Principal Munsiff
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Santhosh Kumar regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayan. E et al regarding realisation of money
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Smt. Sheeja. N regarding plaint rejection
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won