Case Summary
The Canara Bank filed a suit against Flowers NHG and other defendants. The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff was absent, and there was no representation. The court dismissed the suit for default.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- The Canara Bank
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Subha Rafeek
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- W/o.Rafeek
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Fathima
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- W/o. Anwar Khan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Umma Salma
- Party Age
- 41
- Relation
- W/o. Shamsudeen
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Pathumma Beevi
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- W/o. Nisthar
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vahida Beevi
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- W/o. Shaji
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between The Canara Bank, Manacaud Branch vs Flowers NHG et al regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between The Canara Bank, Manacaud Branch vs Flowers NHG et al regarding dismissal for default