Case Summary
Canara Bank filed a suit against Thuhin.S and Sukesan. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the case.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not appear for the proceedings.
The plaintiff did not appear for the proceedings.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not appear for the proceedings.
The plaintiff did not appear for the proceedings.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent. No representation. Though Department notice issued plaintiff not turned.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Canara Bank, Kovalam Branch
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Thuhin.S
- Party Age
- 32
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sukesan
- Party Age
- 60
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Adv.Smt.N.R.Rajani
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Adv. S.S.Dilip Raj
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Evidence:
Though Department notice issued plaintiff not turned. Hence dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2022