Case Summary
Canara Bank filed a suit against Kalarani and Santhakumari.E regarding a dispute that led to the rejection of the plaint. The case was heard and decided by the Principal Munsiff.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint due to the plaintiff not remitting the balance court fee and no application being filed.
Key Reasoning:
The plaint was rejected based on procedural grounds.
The plaint was rejected based on procedural grounds.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaint was rejected based on procedural grounds.
The plaint was rejected based on procedural grounds.
Supporting Evidence
The court found that the balance court fee was not seen remitted and that no application was seen filed.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, the plaint is rejected under Order VII Rule 11 (c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Canara Bank (erstwhile Syndicate Bank)
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kalarani
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Santhakumari.E
- Party Age
- 61
- Relation
- C/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Nizar.A
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The plaint was rejected under Order VII Rule 11 (c) of the Code of Civil Procedure due to balance court fee not seen remitted and no application filed.
Evidence:
the plaint is rejected under Order VII Rule 11 (c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2021