Case Summary
Calicut City Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. filed a petition against multiple respondents. The petition was not pressed during the court proceedings, leading to the closure of the case.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court did not press the petition leading to its closure.
Key Reasoning:
The petition was not pressed by the decree holder.
The petition was not pressed by the decree holder.
Why Defendant Won:
The petition was not pressed by the decree holder.
The petition was not pressed by the decree holder.
Supporting Evidence
The decree holder not pressed the petition.
Judgment Evidence:
EP closed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Calicut City Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. No.D 2777
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Soumya.K
- Party Age
- 32
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Remya.K
- Party Age
- 30
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Chandrika
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. B.V. Deepu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Dhanya
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Decree holder not pressed the petition.
Evidence:
EP closed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Calicut City Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. et al vs Soumya.K et al regarding petition not pressed.
Case Code Year
Case between Calicut City Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. et al vs Soumya.K et al regarding petition not pressed.