Case Summary
The Calicut City Service Co-operative Bank Limited filed a petition against Sharmila and Suma.V for the execution of an order. The decree holder did not press the petition.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed as not pressed.
Key Reasoning:
The decree holder did not press the petition.
The decree holder did not press the petition.
Why Defendant Won:
The decree holder did not press the petition.
The decree holder did not press the petition.
Supporting Evidence
The decree holder did not press the petition.
Judgment Evidence:
EP dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Calicut City Service Co-operative Bank Limited
- Relation
- Rep by its General Manager
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sharmila
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- W/o. Balakrishnan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Suma.V
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- W/o. Raveendran
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. B.V. Deepu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Shilpa.E.K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
EP dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
EP dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Calicut City Service Co-operative Bank Limited vs Sharmila et al regarding petition for execution.
Case Code Year
Case between Calicut City Service Co-operative Bank Limited vs Sharmila et al regarding petition for execution.