Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1037/2020

Case between Byju Sreedharan vs Sarojini et al regarding suit dismissal

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi.C
Order Date
2025-07-21
Duration
approximately-5 years
Case Code No.
1037
Case Closed
Mon, 07/21/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Byju Sreedharan is the plaintiff in a suit against defendants Sarojini and K. Rajasekharan. The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's continuous absence and lack of representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to represent himself in court.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to represent himself in court.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff did not appear in court.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff did not appear in court.
Supporting Evidence
it is seen from proceedings that plaintiff is continuously absent and no representation is made on side of plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence I find no reason to proceed with this suit. Hence suit dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Byju Sreedharan
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sarojini
Party Age
60
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K.Rajasekharan
Party Age
68
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.T.Hari Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.V.Suresh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's continuous absence and lack of representation.
Evidence:
this suit is having been finally heard on 21/07/2025 and the court on the same day delivered the following suit dismissed and counter claim pending.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2020

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Tue, 07/21/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 07/21/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won