Case Summary
B.Vijayan initiated a suit against Shabnam Aslam. Both the plaintiff and defendant were absent during the hearing and the suit was subsequently dismissed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found both parties absent without representation, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff's absence and lack of representation resulted in the dismissal of the suit.
Plaintiff's absence and lack of representation resulted in the dismissal of the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff's absence and lack of representation resulted in the dismissal of the suit.
Plaintiff's absence and lack of representation resulted in the dismissal of the suit.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent. No representation.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- B.Vijayan
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shabnam Aslam
- Party Age
- 55
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Neyyattinkara.P.Nagaraj
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Kaniyapuram.M.Althaf
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Mohammed Anoop.M
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2022