Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS NO. 209/ 2025

Case between Brijesh vs Sreekala et al regarding Injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND.P
Order Date
2025-05-28
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Brijesh, the plaintiff, filed a petition seeking an injunction against Sreekala and Manikandanpilla. The court examined the petition and documents and found a prima facie case for the injunction.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court has granted an ad-interim injunction restraining the defendants from encroaching into the petitioner's pathway.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction preventing encroachment
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court has granted an ad-interim injunction restraining the defendants from encroaching into the petitioner's pathway.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found a prima facie case and recognized the risk of irreparable injury to the petitioner.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found a prima facie case and recognized the risk of irreparable injury to the petitioner.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that, a prima facie case is made out and the delay in issuing notice in this I.A will defeat the very purpose of the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the respondents are restrained from encroaching into petition C schedule pathway and further restrained from committing any act of waste therein until further order.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Brijesh
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sreekala
Party Age
52
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Manikandanpilla
Party Age
58
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. M. Chandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Respondents are restrained from encroaching into petition C schedule pathway and further restrained from committing any act of waste therein.
Evidence:
If ad-interim injunction is not granted, irreparable injury will be caused to the petitioner.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Brijesh vs Sreekala et al regarding Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Brijesh vs Sreekala et al regarding Injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram District
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Arya.G vs Deepthi Sinha regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Anilal et al vs Harilal regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Anoop. P vs Lissy. P. S regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between A. Shahjahan et al vs Shaji et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Ayisha Beevi vs Noushad regarding injunction on property.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won