Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS NO. 323/ 2025

Case between Bhuvaneswari Amma et al vs Raseena regarding an injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND. P., MUNSIFF
Order Date
2025-09-15
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners are Bhuvaneswari Amma, Radhakrishnan. M., and Rajeev Anand, who are seeking an injunction against the respondent, Raseena. The court is considering a delay in issuing notice that may defeat the purpose of the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found that granting the injunction was necessary to prevent irreparable injury to the petitioners.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The respondent is restrained from encroaching into petition properties and committing any acts of waste.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court found that granting the injunction was necessary to prevent irreparable injury to the petitioners.
Why Plaintiff Won:
A prima facie case was made out showing that delay in notice would defeat the suit's purpose.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
A prima facie case was made out showing that delay in notice would defeat the suit's purpose.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that, a prima facie case is made out and the delay in issuing notice in this I.A. will defeat the very purpose of the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the respondent is restrained from encroaching into petition A and B schedule properties and further restrained from committing any act of waste therein.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Bhuvaneswari Amma
Party Age
78
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Radhakrishnan. M.
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rajeev Anand
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jayakumar. T.S.
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Raseena
Party Age
52
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. G. Satheesh Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is restrained from encroaching into petition A and B schedule properties and further restrained from committing any act of waste therein and further restrained from committing any act of waste in petition C schedule pathway or annexing the same with petition D schedule until further orders.
Evidence:
If ad-interim injunction is not granted, irreparable injury will be caused to the petitioners.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Bhuvaneswari Amma et al vs Raseena regarding an injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Bhuvaneswari Amma et al vs Raseena regarding an injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Arya.G vs Deepthi Sinha regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Anilal et al vs Harilal regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Anoop. P vs Lissy. P. S regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between A. Shahjahan et al vs Shaji et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Ayisha Beevi vs Noushad regarding injunction on property.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won