Case Summary
The plaintiffs, Bhadran.S and Beena, filed a suit against The Union Bank of India and its bank officials. The suit was ultimately dismissed as not pressed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit as not pressed upon hearing the case.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Bhadran.S
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Beena
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- The Union Bank of India
- Relation
- represented by its Manager
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- The Authorized Officer/ Chief Manager
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Rajaprathap. S.J
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Suit dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Bhadran.S et al vs The Union Bank of India et al regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Bhadran.S et al vs The Union Bank of India et al regarding dismissal of suit