Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.436/2021

Case between Benny Stancilas vs C.S.B Bank et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and other reliefs.

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-01-21
Duration
approximately-3 years 10 months 28 days
Case Code No.
436
Case Closed
Tue, 01/21/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Benny Stancilas, a businessman, is suing C.S.B Bank and its senior manager, Arun. S. Kumar, over the wrongful attempt to sell his gold pledged as loan collateral. Stancilas claims he has repaid a significant portion of the loan and alleges that the defendants issued false notices regarding repayment.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit filed by Benny Stancilas against C.S.B Bank and its senior manager, stating he was not entitled to the reliefs prayed for. The court found that Stancilas failed to provide sufficient evidence to support his claims.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit filed by Benny Stancilas against C.S.B Bank and its senior manager, stating he was not entitled to the reliefs prayed for. The court found that Stancilas failed to provide sufficient evidence to support his claims.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to prove all necessary elements required for the injunction.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to prove all necessary elements required for the injunction.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff has failed to prove all the necessary elements required to obtain an injunction in his favour.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result: the suit is dismissed. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Benny Stancilas
Party Age
64
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
C.S.B Bank ( Formerly Catholic Syrian Bank Limited )
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Arun. S. Kumar
Relation
Senior Manager
Plaintiffs Documents
A109.03.2021 Statement of account
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Srinivasan Venugopal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The plaintiff requested a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent the defendants from taking possession of his gold.
Evidence:
The plaintiff in this case has failed to prove all the necessary elements required to obtain an injunction in his favour.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to support the plaintiff's claim regarding the notices received from the defendants and the loan repayment status.
Reference:
Ext.A1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2021

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Tue, 03/23/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 01/21/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won