Case Summary
The Bank of Baroda filed a suit against Mr.Alshab.T and Mr.Abdul Latheef.T. The court rejected the plaint due to the absence of the plaintiff and non-payment of the required court fees.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaint was rejected by the court due to the plaintiff's absence and non-payment of court fees. No representation was made for the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the plaintiff was absent and did not pay the necessary court fees.
The court found that the plaintiff was absent and did not pay the necessary court fees.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found that the plaintiff was absent and did not pay the necessary court fees.
The court found that the plaintiff was absent and did not pay the necessary court fees.
Supporting Evidence
The court found that the plaintiff was absent and did not pay the necessary court fees.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence plaint rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 (c) CPC
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- The Bank of Baroda
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mr.Alshab.T
- Party Age
- 28
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mr.Abdul Latheef.T
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Vakalath filed for Plaintiff
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Husna. C.P.M.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between The Bank of Baroda vs Mr.Alshab.T et al regarding rejection of plaint
Case Code Year
Case between The Bank of Baroda vs Mr.Alshab.T et al regarding rejection of plaint