Case Summary
Bank of Baroda, represented by Smt. Asha Kurup, filed a suit against Thulaseedharan and Padmakumari J regarding a financial dispute. The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff was absent and no sufficient reason was provided.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff and lack of sufficient reason to remove the case from the trial list.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Not available
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, suit stands dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Bank of Baroda
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Thulaseedharan
- Party Age
- 72
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Padmakumari J
- Party Age
- 69
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. T.J. Shakeela Beegum
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. S.Vijayan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of sufficient reason to remove it from the trial list.
Evidence:
Hence, suit stands dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Bank of Baroda et al vs Thulaseedharan et al regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Bank of Baroda et al vs Thulaseedharan et al regarding dismissal of suit