Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.649/2025

Case between B. Sukumaran Nair vs B. Sugunarajan Nair regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-RCC
Judge
Smt.Salini.B
Order Date
2025-07-31
Duration
approximately-5 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

B. Sukumaran Nair, the plaintiff, filed a suit against his younger brother B. Sugunarajan Nair for a permanent prohibitory injunction regarding a property dispute. The plaintiff claims that the defendant trespassed onto his property and attempted to dump waste.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, granting a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant. The defendant is restrained from trespassing on the plaintiff's property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, granting a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant. The defendant is restrained from trespassing on the plaintiff's property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiff's unchallenged evidence proves his case.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Plaintiff's unchallenged evidence proves his case.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff’s unchallenged evidence proves his case and he is entitled to a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction as sought for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs and the defendant is restrained and prohibited by a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing into the plaint schedule property.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
B. Sukumaran Nair
Party Age
80
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
B. Sugunarajan Nair
Party Age
70
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of Partition deed No.245/1977, Copy of tax receipt dated 26.12.2024, Copy of digital sketch of plaint schedule property, Copy of acknowledgment receipt from Vizhinjam Police station dated 27.08.2024
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Aryakrishnan. S.H
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. N. Govardhan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff sought a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant's trespassing.
Evidence:
the suit is decreed with costs and the defendant is restrained and prohibited by a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing into the plaint schedule property

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of Partition deed No.245/1977 dated 31.01.1977 establishes plaintiff’s ownership and possession.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of tax receipt dated 26.12.2024 supports plaintiff’s claim regarding the property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Digital Sketch
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of digital sketch of plaint schedule property provides clarity on property boundaries.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Acknowledgment Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of acknowledgment receipt from Vizhinjam Police station dated 27.08.2024 indicates the complaint lodged by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between B. Sukumaran Nair vs B. Sugunarajan Nair regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between B. Sukumaran Nair vs B. Sugunarajan Nair regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won