Case Summary
Ayisha Nida is the petitioner seeking relief related to a Rent Control Petition. Sherin.V is the respondent who did not enter an appearance.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the application for correction in the petition schedule and closed the execution petition.
Key Reasoning:
The respondents did not enter an appearance, leading to the dismissal of the application.
The respondents did not enter an appearance, leading to the dismissal of the application.
Why Defendant Won:
The respondents did not enter an appearance, leading to the dismissal of the application.
The respondents did not enter an appearance, leading to the dismissal of the application.
Supporting Evidence
The respondents did not enter an appearance, leading to the dismissal of the application.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence EP closed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ayisha Nida
- Party Age
- 22
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Abdul Rasheed
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sherin.V
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P. Krishnakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ayisha Nida vs Sherin.V regarding Rent Control Petition
Case Code Year
Case between Ayisha Nida vs Sherin.V regarding Rent Control Petition