Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.1651.2018

Case between Aswathy. A.S @ Nisha vs Santhakumari @ Salini et al regarding setting aside a sale deed

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi.C
Order Date
2025-06-04
Duration
approximately-7 years 13 days
Case Closed
Wed, 06/04/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Aswathy. A.S @ Nisha, seeks to set aside a sale deed executed by her mother, the first defendant, without court permission. The case involves issues of property ownership related to the plaint schedule property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed, and the property is ordered to be divided, granting the plaintiff 1/3 share. The sale deed in favor of the defendants executed by the first defendant is set aside as void concerning the plaintiff's rights.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Division of plaint schedule property and setting aside of certain sale deeds
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed, and the property is ordered to be divided, granting the plaintiff 1/3 share. The sale deed in favor of the defendants executed by the first defendant is set aside as void concerning the plaintiff's rights.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved ownership and possession over the plaint schedule property.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff's ownership and possession over the plaint schedule property is proved by Ext.A1 and the oral evidence of PW1. The evidence of plaintiff remains unchallenged.

Judgment Evidence:

The suit is decreed as follows: (1) Plaint schedule property is ordered to be divided by metes and bounds and the plaintiff is entitled to 1/3 share over plaint schedule property. (2) Sale deed No.3906/1993 dated 20/10/1993 of Sub Registrar Office, Malayinkeezhu in favour of defendants 2 and 3 executed by the first defendant is set aside as void.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Aswathy. A.S @ Nisha
Party Age
32
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Santhakumari @ Salini
Party Age
62
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajappan
Party Age
64
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nirmala
Party Age
62
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
C.S. Santhosh kumar
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
R.N. Manju
Party Age
39
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Sale Deed No.538/1989, Certified copy of Sale Deed No.3906/1993, Certified copy of Settlement Deed No.339/2002
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv.Smt. Asha. P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Declaration setting aside the sale deed No.3906/1993 and the settlement deed No.339/2002 as void in relation to the plaintiff's rights.
Evidence:
The court declared that the sale deed No.3906/1993 dated 20/10/1993 of Sub Registrar Office, Malayinkeezhu in favour of defendants 2 and 3 executed by the first defendant and the settlement deed No.339/2002 dated 31/01/2022 executed by defendants 2 and 3 in favour of defendants 4 and 5 through Sub Registrar office, Malayinkeezhu is set aside as void so far as it relates to plaintiffs right over 1/3 share in plaint schedule property.
Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Possession of 1/3 share of the plaint schedule property is awarded to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to 1/3 share over the plaint schedule property as claimed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Sale deed No.538/1989 executed in favour of plaintiff and others, establishing the plaintiff's ownership and possession over the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Sale deed No.3906/1993 executed in favour of defendants 2 and 3 by the first defendant, which the court set aside.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Settlement deed No.339/2002 executed by defendants 2 and 3 in favour of defendants 4 and 5, which the court declared void in relation to the plaintiff's rights.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: SSLC Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of the SSLC certificate of the plaintiff, establishing her educational qualifications.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Higher Secondary Course Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of the Higher Secondary course certificate of the plaintiff, supporting her educational qualifications.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Diploma Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of certificate of diploma in general nursing and midwifery, establishing further qualifications of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Nursing Council Registration
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of Karnataka State Nursing Council Registration Certificate, establishing the plaintiff's professional qualifications.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: University Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of certificate from Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Karnataka, dated 05/04/2016, confirming the plaintiff's educational achievements.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Qualification Registration
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of registration certificate of additional qualification issued from Karnataka State Nursing Council, further supporting the plaintiff's qualifications.
Reference:
Ext.A9

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Aswathy. A.S @ Nisha vs Santhakumari @ Salini et al regarding setting aside a sale deed
Case Code Year
Case between Aswathy. A.S @ Nisha vs Santhakumari @ Salini et al regarding setting aside a sale deed

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Thu, 06/21/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 06/04/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won