Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R C P No.134/2020

Case between Assan Koya et al vs Subaida et al regarding eviction and rent arrears

Court
Rent Control Court/Additional Munsiff-II
Judge
Smt. Meera John.K
Order Date
2025-01-09
Duration
approximately-4 years 9 months
Case Closed
Thu, 01/09/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves a petition filed by the heirs of Assan Koya for eviction of Subaida and others due to non-payment of rent. The petitioners assert a bonafide need for the property for their own business.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition for eviction was granted, and the respondents must vacate the property within one month. They are also ordered to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction of respondents and costs of the proceedings.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition for eviction was granted, and the respondents must vacate the property within one month. They are also ordered to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioners demonstrated a bonafide need for the property and valid reasons for eviction.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioners demonstrated a bonafide need for the property and valid reasons for eviction.
Supporting Evidence
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. The evidence of PW1 coupled with Exts.A1, A2, C1, C1(a) remains unchallenged. Hence, the petitioner is entitled to get a relief as sought for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, this petition is allowed under Section 11(3), 11(2)(b) of Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act as follows: 1) That the respondents are directed to surrender vacant possession of the petition schedule shop room within one month from today, failing which the petitioner can execute the same through process of law. 2) The respondents shall pay the cost of the proceedings to the petitioner.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Assan Koya
Party Age
67
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Seenath
Party Age
58
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Muhammed Hassan.P
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Muneer Hassan.P
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mubeena.P
Party Age
33
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Subaida
Party Age
62
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
S.V. Sabira
Party Age
40
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
S.V.Riyas
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
S V. Rubina
Party Age
36
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
S V Risana
Party Age
33
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Coolikychit No/1206/82 of SRO, Meenchantha, Copy of Lawyer notice.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.V.Sunil Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.C.Balachandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Respondents are directed to surrender vacant possession of the petition schedule shop room.
Evidence:
In the result, this petition is allowed under Section 11(3), 11(2)(b) of Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act as follows:- 1)That the respondents are directed to surrender vacant possession of the petition schedule shop room within one month from today.
Relief Type: Cost of proceedings
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Respondents shall pay the cost of the proceedings to the petitioner.
Evidence:
2) The respondents shall pay the cost of the proceedings to the petitioner.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Coolikychit
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence to support the ownership and tenancy relationship.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documentation of the demand for arrears of rent.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Provided findings relevant to the petition.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Visual evidence supporting the layout and situation of the shop room.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Arrears of Rent
Case Code
Case between Assan Koya et al vs Subaida et al regarding eviction and rent arrears
Case Code Year
Case between Assan Koya et al vs Subaida et al regarding eviction and rent arrears

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Wed, 04/01/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 01/09/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between C.Jayaraj Panicker et al vs M.P.Mujeeb Rahman regarding eviction and rent arrears
Rent Control Court/Additional Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Devasya vs V. K.Sasi regarding eviction from shop room
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Pandikasala Vahija et al vs Musthafa Alungal regarding eviction from shop rooms
Rent Control Court/Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Pandikasala Sabira et al vs Hashim Thangal regarding eviction from shop room
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Pandikasala Vahija et al vs Musthafa Alungal regarding eviction.
Rent Control Court/Munsiff-II
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won