Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S.No.169/2022

Case between Ashraf vs Sikkanthar et al regarding arrears of rent.

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt.Meera John K
Order Date
2025-12-04
Duration
approximately-3 years 6 months
Case Code No.
169
Case Closed
Thu, 12/04/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves the plaintiff Ashraf who filed a suit for recovery of rent arrears against the defendants Sikkanthar and Muhammed Ashraf. The plaintiff alleges failure of the defendants to pay rent for a property entrusted to them under a lease agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay a total of ₹7,83,000 towards rent arrears with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants are directed to pay ₹7,83,000 to the plaintiff towards rent arrears with interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay a total of ₹7,83,000 towards rent arrears with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unchallenged evidence of the plaintiff demonstrated entitlement to a decree as prayed for.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The unchallenged evidence of the plaintiff demonstrated entitlement to a decree as prayed for.
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged evidence of PW1 and Ext.A1 to A7 would show that the plaintiff is entitled to a decree as prayed for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: Defendants are directed to Pay ₹7,83,000/- to the plaintiff towards rent arrears with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and with future interest at the rate of 6% from the date of decree till realisation of decree amount.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ashraf
Party Age
61
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sikkanthar
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Muhammed Ashraf
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of registered lawyer notice with postal receipts, Unclaimed cover with Acknowledgement card of returned Lawyer Notice, Acknowledgement card, Pass book of Kshemanidhi deposit, Copy of License agreement.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.K.M.Muhammed Iqubal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.C.V.Noorjahan.C.V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.KM Musthafa
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Prasanth U
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants are directed to pay ₹7,83,000/- to the plaintiff towards rent arrears.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: Defendants are directed to Pay ₹7,83,000/- to the plaintiff towards rent arrears with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and with future interest at the rate of 6% from the date of decree till realization of decree amount.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to get the costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: The plaintiff is entitled to get the costs of the suit from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Copy of registered lawyer notice with postal receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Issued by Adv.KM Muhammed Iqubal to Sikkandhar and another.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Unclaimed cover with Acknowledgement card of returned Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Part of the evidence presented by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Unclaimed cover with Acknowledgement card of returned Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Part of the evidence presented by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Acknowledgement Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Part of the evidence presented by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Pass book of Kshemanidhi deposit
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of payments made by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Pass book of Kshemanidhi deposit
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of payments made by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Pass book issued by Vengeri Urban Co-operative Society
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of payments made by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Copy of License agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of rent agreement between M.K.Ashraf and Muhammed Ashraf.
Reference:
Ext.A8

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
O.S.NO.
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Wed, 06/01/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 12/04/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Gokuldas KT vs Sudheesh Kumar regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s.Mahesh Kumar Natvarlal and Co. vs 1PP Jameela regarding realisation of an amount due from defendants.
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Limited vs Al Shahal K.M. et al regarding suit dismissal for non-representation.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between The Vijaya Bank vs Mr. Thanseer et al regarding realization of an amount due from defendants.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s. Konari Enterprises vs M/s.K.M.Traders regarding return of money
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won