Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 29 / 2023

Case between Gokuldas KT vs Sudheesh Kumar regarding realization of money

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt.Meera John K.
Order Date
2025-07-25
Duration
approximately-4 years 6 months
Case Closed
Fri, 07/25/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Gokuldas KT filed a suit against Sudheesh Kumar for the realization of an advance amount paid under an agreement for sale of property. The defendant did not provide the necessary documents for the sale deed, leading to the plaintiff filing this suit.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, granting them the advance amount paid along with interest. The defendant was ordered to pay costs of the suit as well.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs. 1,70,000 with interest and costs of the suit.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, granting them the advance amount paid along with interest. The defendant was ordered to pay costs of the suit as well.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unchallenged evidence of the plaintiff indicated entitlement to a decree as prayed for.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The unchallenged evidence of the plaintiff indicated entitlement to a decree as prayed for.
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged evidence of PW1 and Ext.A1 to A4 would show that the plaintiff is entitled to a decree as prayed for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1.The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs. 1,70,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Seventy Thousand only) from the defendant with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and with future interest at the rate of 6% from the date of decree till realisation of decree amount.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Gokuldas KT
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sudheesh Kumar
Party Age
59
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Sale agreement executed between Sudheeshkumar and Gokuldas, Certified copy of Jenmam assignment deed No.1957/03 of SRO Kakkodi, Copy of lawyer notice sent by Adv.Swapna CP to Sudheesh Kumar, Reply of lawyer notice sent by Adv.Vinod Singh Cheriyan to Adv.Swapna CP.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.A Basheer
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Swapna CP
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Athira PS
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Sruthi
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Vinod Singh Cheriyan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.TM Khalid
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt.Sarany O
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt.Seema Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs. 1,70,000 from the defendant.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1.The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs. 1,70,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Seventy Thousand only) from the defendant with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and with future interest at the rate of 6% from the date of decree till realisation of decree amount.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The sale agreement executed between Sudheesh Kumar and Gokuldas detailing the terms of the sale.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Certified copy of Jenmam assignment deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
A certified copy of the assignment deed related to the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The notice sent by Adv. Swapna CP to Sudheesh Kumar demanding execution of the sale deed.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Lawyer Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The reply notice sent by Adv. Vinod Singh Cheriyan in response to the complaint.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Gokuldas KT vs Sudheesh Kumar regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Gokuldas KT vs Sudheesh Kumar regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Thu, 01/14/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 07/25/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between State Bank of India vs Mr.Deeshith Unnikrishnan et al regarding realisation of an amount due from defendants
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s.Mahesh Kumar Natvarlal and Co. vs 1PP Jameela regarding realisation of an amount due from defendants.
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Limited vs Al Shahal K.M. et al regarding suit dismissal for non-representation.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between The Vijaya Bank vs Mr. Thanseer et al regarding realization of an amount due from defendants.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s. Konari Enterprises vs M/s.K.M.Traders regarding return of money
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won