Case Summary
Ashraf Ali, the petitioner, filed a rent control petition against Nazeer, the counter petitioner. The matter was settled between the parties, and the petitioner is not pressing the petition.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed as not pressed after the parties reached a settlement.
Key Reasoning:
The matter was settled between the parties, leading to the dismissal of the petition.
The matter was settled between the parties, leading to the dismissal of the petition.
Why Defendant Won:
The matter was settled between the parties, leading to the dismissal of the petition.
The matter was settled between the parties, leading to the dismissal of the petition.
Supporting Evidence
Submission endorsed. Hence petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ashraf Ali
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nazeer
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P.A. Sivakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Petitioner is not pressing the petition and it is dismissed.
Evidence:
Hence petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
R.C.P.NO.
Case Code Year
2024