Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.690/2021

Case between A.Sarojini vs T.S.Sandhyarani, Surendran regarding dismissal of suit

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi.C
Order Date
2025-08-14
Duration
Case Closed
Thu, 08/14/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

A.Sarojini is the plaintiff, and the defendants are T.S.Sandhyarani and Surendran. The case was dismissed as the plaintiff was absent and not ready to adduce evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff and the lack of sufficient reasons provided in the petition to remove the case from the list.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff and the lack of sufficient reasons provided in the petition to remove the case from the list.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and unprepared to proceed with the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was absent and unprepared to proceed with the case.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff was absent and not ready to adduce evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

As plaintiff is absent and not ready to adduce evidence suit dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
A.Sarojini
Party Age
61
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
T.S.Sandhyarani
Party Age
36
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Surendran
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. M.R.Anandakuttan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. S.Rajeev
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. T.Gopakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
G.Bhuvanachandran Nair
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed as the plaintiff was absent and not ready to adduce evidence.
Evidence:
As plaintiff is absent and not ready to adduce evidence suit dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between A.Sarojini vs T.S.Sandhyarani, Surendran regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between A.Sarojini vs T.S.Sandhyarani, Surendran regarding dismissal of suit

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
Thu, 08/14/2025 - 12:00
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won