Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.1046.2020

Case between Anupriya Vijayan vs Government of Kerala et al regarding plaint rejection

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi.C
Order Date
2025-06-02
Duration
Case Closed
Mon, 06/02/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Anupriya Vijayan is the plaintiff in this case against the Government of Kerala and The Director of Higher Secondary Education. The court rejected the plaint due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to remit the balance court fee.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the plaint due to the plaintiff's absence and the non-remittance of balance court fees.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint due to the plaintiff's absence and the non-remittance of balance court fees.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent and did not remit court fees.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff was absent and did not remit court fees.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent no representation. Defendant represented. No Balance Court Fee remitted.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence plaint rejected under order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Anupriya Vijayan
Party Age
18
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Government of Kerala
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Director, The Directorate of Higher Secondary Education
Relation
represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Deepu.U.V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. V.C. Vivek
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. M.S.Salahudeen
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Plaint was rejected due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Evidence:
No Balance Court Fee remitted. Hence plaint rejected under order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Anupriya Vijayan vs Government of Kerala et al regarding plaint rejection
Case Code Year
Case between Anupriya Vijayan vs Government of Kerala et al regarding plaint rejection

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
Mon, 06/02/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Government

Similar Cases

Case between S.R. Amritha vs State of Kerala, The Secretary to Government, Public Works Department, Vilapil Grama Panchayath regarding suit dismissing for default.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Manoharan vs State of Kerala regarding suit dismissed as not pressed.
THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Noorjahan vs Kerala State Electricity Board et al regarding default dismissal of suit.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between State of Kerala et al vs Dr N. Kumudesan et al regarding condonation of delay in filing restoration petition.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between S.Sreejith.IPS vs K.M.Shajahan regarding damages
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won