Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.823/2023

Case between Ansil Muhammed et al vs Abdul Hassan et al regarding a civil suit

Court
THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi.C
Order Date
2025-06-11
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves plaintiffs Ansil Muhammed and Shaiju against defendants Abdul Hassan, Majusha Saibinisha, and K.S.Riyad. The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's continuous absence and lack of representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation during the proceedings.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation during the proceedings.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not appear in court, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not appear in court, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Supporting Evidence
Even in spite of issuance of department notice plaintiff not turned up nor represented.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ansil Muhammed
Party Age
22
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shaiju
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abdul Hassan
Party Age
77
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Majusha Saibinisha
Party Age
45
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K.S.Riyad
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P. Suresh Babu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Malavika Unni
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. P.S. Harikumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anuprasanth.M
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's continuous absence.
Evidence:
Hence I find no reason to proceed with the suit. Hence suit dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ansil Muhammed et al vs Abdul Hassan et al regarding a civil suit
Case Code Year
Case between Ansil Muhammed et al vs Abdul Hassan et al regarding a civil suit

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won