Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1234/2020

Case between Anitha Kumari vs G. Ramachandran regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Judge
Sri.Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-06-09
Duration
approximately-5 years 16 days
Case Code No.
1234
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Anitha Kumari filed a suit against G. Ramachandran for a permanent prohibitory injunction concerning disputes over property and alleged obstruction during construction. The respondent claims the applicant's actions are intended to harass him.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the application for amendment of pleadings and directed the applicant to pay costs to the respondent.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The applicant is directed to pay costs of ₹1,000/- to the respondent.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the application for amendment of pleadings and directed the applicant to pay costs to the respondent.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The amendment was necessary for the effective adjudication of the controversy between the parties.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Moreover, the proposed amendment is required for the effective and proper adjudication of the controversy between the parties.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; The application is allowed as follows: (a)The applicant is directed to pay costs of ₹1,000/- to the respondent within 20 days from today.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Anitha Kumari
Party Age
59
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
G. Ramachandran
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Punchakkary G.Raveendran Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Renjith C. Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The applicant is directed to pay costs of ₹1,000/- to the respondent within 20 days from today.
Evidence:
In the result; The application is allowed as follows: (a) The applicant is directed to pay costs of ₹1,000/- to the respondent within 20 days from today.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2020

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Tue, 06/09/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won