Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 798/2016

Case between Ammukutty.K et al vs Raju et al regarding dismissal for default

Court
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri.Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-06-03
Duration
approximately-8 years
Case Closed
Tue, 06/03/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves plaintiffs led by Ammukutty.K and defendants led by Raju. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the absence of the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaintiff was absent, and the suit was dismissed due to default without any costs.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff was absent, and the suit was dismissed due to default without any costs.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff was absent during the hearing.

Judgment Evidence:

Since, the plaintiff is neither present nor represented, the suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ammukutty.K
Party Age
70
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sarasamma
Party Age
68
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Surendran
Party Age
58
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jayasree
Party Age
52
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sheela
Party Age
48
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Raju
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Viji.L
Party Age
38
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Krishnan Nadar Kochappy
Party Age
82
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jolly
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. G.V. Sudheerkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Vembayam.A.A. Hakkim
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Priyan.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Since, the plaintiff is neither present nor represented, the suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ammukutty.K et al vs Raju et al regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Ammukutty.K et al vs Raju et al regarding dismissal for default

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Fri, 01/01/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 06/03/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won