Case Summary
Ambujakshy, the plaintiff, filed a suit against Pramodkumar G.K, the defendant. The case was dismissed for default due to the absence of both parties.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of both the plaintiff and defendant. No costs were incurred.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was dismissed due to the non-appearance of the plaintiff and defendant.
The suit was dismissed due to the non-appearance of the plaintiff and defendant.
Why Defendant Won:
The suit was dismissed due to the non-appearance of the plaintiff and defendant.
The suit was dismissed due to the non-appearance of the plaintiff and defendant.
Supporting Evidence
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of both parties.
Judgment Evidence:
Since, the plaintiff is neither present nor represented even after repeated calling of the case, the suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ambujakshy
- Party Age
- 66
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Pramodkumar G.K
- Party Age
- 47
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. V. Sanal Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. S. Jayakrishnan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.R. Santhosh
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ambujakshy vs Pramodkumar G.K regarding suit dismissal
Case Code Year
Case between Ambujakshy vs Pramodkumar G.K regarding suit dismissal